Talk:Lucia Thione-Hhune

Appearances
We shouldn't be adding the sourcebooks a character is written about in the Appearances section. Those can be gathered from the references section. An exception could be made however, if there's an actual story in the sourcebook. -hashtalk 15:27, November 24, 2014 (UTC)


 * very much agreed Lhynard (talk) 15:30, November 24, 2014 (UTC)


 * Just adjusting my personal ruleset... Does all admins agree with this? I have been adding all references to the Appearance section... Hash is one vote... with another one, I will follow suit :) - Darkwynters (talk) 00:30, November 25, 2014 (UTC)


 * Here was where I 1st read about the use of the Appearances section: Forum:Standardizing_article_sections. Its examples are "Novels / video games, etc.", which to me doesn't include sourcebooks, but I'm new here. Lhynard (talk) 00:51, November 25, 2014 (UTC)


 * Hmmm, interesting... and I helped create that forum page... hmmm... still, let's see what others think ;) Darkwynters (talk) 00:55, November 25, 2014 (UTC)


 * As long as the sourcebook shows up in the references (and why wouldn't it?) then it doesn't need to be listed in the Appearances, IMHO. Novels, magazine articles, comics, etc. are good examples of Appearances. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 01:48, November 25, 2014 (UTC)

I kind of agree; to me, an Appearance means someone appears as a character. But a sourcebook can give such a complete write-up of a character, with a picture, stats, and such, that it might as well be an appearance. And do we do the same with locations? A sourcebook might give more information than a brief novel mention. And races: orcs might appear in every novel, but rarely is that a relevant appearance. So, I'm more in favour of an editor's judgement of how notable an appearance is and sources that give a very good impression and picture of the subject. — BadCatMan (talk) 10:19, November 25, 2014 (UTC)