Category talk:Aquatic creatures

Pre-Merge Discussion
This page should probably be a category, yes? ~ Lhynard (talk) 01:49, May 29, 2015 (UTC)


 * Unless there is more to being an aquatic creature than the two sentences on this page, then we might as well move those sentences to Category:Aquatic creatures and delete this. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 18:25, May 29, 2015 (UTC)


 * My thoughts exactly. ~ Lhynard (talk) 19:09, May 29, 2015 (UTC)


 * Well, it does have some references that might be worth keeping, so I dunno. :p &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 18:27, May 29, 2015 (UTC)


 * One can put refs in a category page. ~ Lhynard (talk) 19:12, May 29, 2015 (UTC)


 * &hellip;although not that many! But those will all be found in the articles for the creatures themselves. We only need a single ref for the definition of the category name itself, like I've been doing on these category pages: Category:Creatures by subtype. ~ Lhynard (talk) 19:14, May 29, 2015 (UTC)


 * Remember we have Natural creature, Shadow creature, and Elemental creature... while I really do not care... I also do not want a lot of references in the category... or a lot of info in the category pages... makes them look cluttered... my two cents :) - Darkwynters (talk) 23:56, May 29, 2015 (UTC)


 * I agree in principle about the clutter on such pages. I've tried to keep my new subtype categories to two sentences. Do they appear cluttered to you? ~ Lhynard (talk) 00:06, May 30, 2015 (UTC)


 * Naw... they are fine... I am just set in my ways for having no references in the category pages... but I have to learn to change... we are a community... we much work together... so go ahead and change all these pages to categories... unless Movie or BadCat disagree. - Darkwynters (talk) 00:12, May 30, 2015 (UTC)


 * I prefer a brief explanation, or a Main link, or a cat jump on category pages. It seems silly to have a one-sentence page with a footnote. How about instead of using a &lt;ref&gt; tag and a Reference heading, you just append "...as described on page 305 of Monster Manual 3.5." to the description? &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 01:09, May 30, 2015 (UTC)


 * Ok, I like that idea. ~ Lhynard (talk) 02:37, May 30, 2015 (UTC)


 * That does not sound too bad :) - Darkwynters (talk) 03:06, May 30, 2015 (UTC)

Post-Merge Discussion
Ok, so I've merged that article into this one and brought this talk along with it. ~ Lhynard (talk) 04:47, June 3, 2015 (UTC)