Forgotten Realms Wiki talk:Requests

Is there any deeper meaning behind this list? :S - confused Zerak-Tul 19:56, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Nope, just what the people want to see made. Most of which seems to be Baldur's Gate NPCs. hash

Some of these have turned blue because they have been made. Should these be removed from this list or moved into a 'Requested but already made' section or a different action? Fw190a8 16:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * In my opinion we should clear the list, and restart it with a format where people can request a max of 3(?) articles at a time, signing their name, so we know who to ask if we have no clue about what article they wanted.. That, and most of the current requested pages seem really obscure. Zerak talk 20:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I think thats a good idea. I suggest that we also temporarily cross-out future requested articles that are turned blue as is done in the Wanted Pages section, THEN move them to a seperate, "RbaM" section. Also I believe Angelo is just another somewhat minor BG NPC. Johnnyriot999 11:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Useless articles
What if something mentioned here is just not worth having? Like the Candlekeep Inn? Seriously, it's the inn at Candlekeep. That's it. Ville V. Kokko 21:43, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Cleared out the requests :) Zerak talk 21:54, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I just created one of those articles on the old list. Ville V. Kokko 22:08, 7 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Ville, I appreciate what you say about the Candlekeep Inn being just an inn, but one man's (or woman's) garbage is another man's (or woman's) gold! Perhaps there was a notable encounter at the inn some time in the past, or perhaps it was created by a notable character, or some ancient relic is hanging on the wall, or there could be a few reasons why the article might be useful. We have no article limit, unlike a paper encyclopedia, so there is no limit to the number of articles we can add, provided there's something in FR lore about it. I appreciate that this might not be everyone's interpretation of what makes a good wiki though, and my opinion matters no more than anyone else's.


 * What should be done about this section? Do we need to keep the list of requested articles? I filled in a small number, but is it really used all that much? Fw190a8 23:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I reckon it's a good idea, in theory, but just another of the things we don't yet have enough editors/visitors for to pull off properly. Zerak talk 23:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)