Forum:Standardizing article sections

{{Forum post
 * Copied from FW's talk

Person

 * Physical description
 * Personality
 * History
 * Abilities (or special powers)
 * Equipment
 * Allies (or associates) / Relationships, instead
 * Appearances - Novels / video games, etc.
 * Notes or discrepancies
 * Gallery
 * References

Buildings

 * Geography
 * History
 * Structure
 * Interior
 * Inhabitants
 * Defenses
 * Appearances - Novels / video games, etc.
 * Notes or discrepancies
 * Gallery
 * References

Locations

 * Geography (or geographic location or area)
 * History
 * Inhabitants
 * Government
 * Trade
 * Defenses
 * Geographical features (listing)
 * Notable locations (listing)
 * Appearances - Novels / video games, etc.
 * Notes or discrepancies
 * Gallery
 * References

Items

 * Physical description
 * History
 * Powers
 * Notable "owners" or similar items (listing)
 * Appearances - Novels / video games, etc.
 * Notes or discrepancies
 * Gallery
 * References

Creatures

 * Physical description
 * Personality (or Behavior)
 * History
 * Combat
 * Ecology / Habitat perhaps
 * Notable "creatures" (specific creatures or characters) (listing)
 * Appearances - Novels / video games, etc.
 * Notes or discrepancies
 * Gallery
 * References

Organizations

 * Personality (or something to do with their actions or typical behavior or maybe just Organization)
 * History
 * Enemies (or Relationships, which sounds more encompassing)
 * Specialized equipment
 * Tactics
 * Members (listing)
 * Appearances - Novels / video games, etc.
 * Notes or discrepancies
 * Gallery
 * References

With FW's suggestion I have moved the History section... actually, the history section could be even further down (Maybe before the listing sections, such as notable locations or Members), but I placed it after the initial description of the subject of the page... mainly, I am interested in streamlining the appearance and consistency of the wiki pages... plus, if this is made policy, it will be something to show new members how to create and organize their new pages... any thoughts :)
 * Darkwynters (talk) 19:38, October 8, 2012 (UTC) }}

{{Forum post
 * Updated... so BadCat, you think "Appendix" should encompass "Appearances", "Discrepancies", and "Notes"? Feel free anyone to adjust the list below :)

Person

 * Description
 * Personality
 * Powers
 * Equipment
 * Activities
 * Relationships
 * History
 * Appearances - Novels / video games, etc.
 * Notes or discrepancies
 * Gallery
 * References

Buildings

 * Geography
 * Structure
 * Interior
 * Defenses
 * History
 * Rumors
 * Inhabitants
 * Appearances - Novels / video games, etc.
 * Notes or discrepancies
 * Gallery
 * References

Locations

 * Geography
 * Geographical features (listing) - Subcat
 * Government
 * Trade
 * Defenses
 * History
 * Rumors
 * Notable locations (listing)
 * Inhabitants
 * Appearances - Novels / video games, etc.
 * Notes or discrepancies
 * Gallery
 * References

Items

 * Description
 * Powers
 * History
 * Notable "owners" or similar items (listing)
 * Appearances - Novels / video games, etc.
 * Notes or discrepancies
 * Gallery
 * References

Spells

 * Description
 * Powers or Effects
 * Components
 * History
 * Appearances - Novels / video games, etc.
 * Notes or discrepancies
 * Gallery
 * References

Creatures

 * Description
 * Personality (or Behavior) - Behavior might make more sense
 * Combat
 * Ecology - Society is sort of a subcat
 * History
 * Notable "creatures" (specific creatures or characters) (listing)
 * Appearances - Novels / video games, etc.
 * Notes or discrepancies
 * Gallery
 * References

Organizations

 * Activities
 * Tactics
 * Specialized equipment
 * Relationships
 * History
 * Members (listing)
 * Appearances - Novels / video games, etc.
 * Notes or discrepancies
 * Gallery
 * References
 * Darkwynters (talk) 18:21, December 9, 2012 (UTC)}}