Category talk:Organizations by location

I think that before this category gets too populated, we should switch from "PLACENAME organizations" to "Organizations in PLACENAME" so that it's like the other categories. One advantage is that the names will be more consistent. For example, with Evereska, the current method would yield "Evereskan organizations", requiring that the reader knows that something from Evereska is referred to as Evereskan, whereas with the proposed method, it would yield "Organizations from Evereska". Fw190a8 23:23, 26 December 2007 (UTC)