Talk:Ecology

Clarification: Non-Forgotten realms creatures
Do we keep the creatures who aren't in the FR campaign universe? Or remove them? Or remove the " "'s so they are just plain text? Cheers--Regis87 (talk) 21:20, March 12, 2018 (UTC)


 * My opinion is leave them red until we can definitively say they were never in an official FR source or novel. If any of the creatures are merely mentioned (without stats or enough information to create a full article) then we can mark its appearance in the appendix section and fill in the article using D&D or AD&D source material. Ruf (talk) 23:19, March 12, 2018 (UTC)


 * I agree with Ruf. Just don't go making any navboxes. Our policy is to not have red links in navboxes, but in articles, they are fine.


 * In fact, they are desired for something like this. That way, if I discover a creature in an FR source and write an article about it, I can click "What links here" and see, oh, Ecology did one of these.


 * ~ Lhynard (talk) 14:02, March 15, 2018 (UTC)