Talk:Ithmong (Lapaliiya)

Is there any point in disambiguation pages (Ithmong (disambiguation) for this case) with only two entries? If we can just point the pages to each other, should they be candidates for deletion? ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 01:29, November 17, 2018 (UTC)


 * No, we don't need two, but it makes life easier if a third Darromar ever pops up in lore, so I don't think we need delete it either. I would never create such a page, but if it already exists, it's not a major issue. It causes zero harm. ~ Lhynard (talk) 01:36, November 17, 2018 (UTC)


 * Following up on this in case anyone else makes the same error I made:
 * This was discussed this on Slack, and the solution for these cases is to keep the disambiguation page (which can be found in the search bar, when searching for say, "Ithmong"). Thus, instead of using Otheruses, use Otheruses4 to link to the disambiguation page as well as give a description of the current page, instead of just linking to the other only use. This also future proofs updating the other uses tag, in the case that other terms come up in the future. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 02:16, November 17, 2018 (UTC)