Template talk:Cite book/Planes of Law

Boxed set qualifier
Do we actually need the "(boxed set)" ending within the citation templates? The new automated citation link feature points in this case to the non-existant Template:Cite book/Planes of Law, which kind of makes more sense to me. The fact that its a citation template should in itself make clear that we are talking about the publication, not the group of Outer Planes. Daranios (talk) 15:45, January 16, 2019 (UTC)
 * I assume it's titled this way because the article on the product itself is found at Planes of Law (boxed set) (presumably to distinguish it from a potential article on the actual Planes of Law). That being said, since there is no other product titled "Planes of Law", the "(boxed set)" part should probably be removed. --Ir&#39;revrykal (talk) 19:23, January 16, 2019 (UTC)