Talk:Animal growth

Reverse Spell(s)
I think the "reverse" spell(s) should be separate articles. Reduce animal is only a level 2 druid spell, and the animal must be "willing", so there are enough differences for it not to be simply the reverse of animal growth, as I see it. Thoughts? ~ Lhynard (talk) 19:40, June 9, 2016 (UTC)


 * Reversible spells are a 1st and 2nd edition thing. The spell description was named for one version of the spell and they added the word "reversible" to the title or just below the title. The reverse version of the spell was described in the body of the spell description somewhere, including the alternate name, if applicable. The vast majority of these are one or two sentences at most, and would not have enough info to make a new article without duplicating most of the non-reversed version.
 * If there is a 3rd edition spell that reverses another 3rd edition spell, then it would be okay to make a separate article, and indeed, there should be a separate article if the level of the spell is different than its reverse. Same goes for 4th or 5th edition. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 19:56, June 9, 2016 (UTC)


 * I have now created a separate article Reduce animal. Situation is even more strange here, as 1st and 2nd edition do not explicitely name the reverse form of the priest version. The Priest's Spell Compendium then adds to the confusion by calling the reversed from both shrink animal and reduce animal. I have added this to the reduce animal article, but I am not sure if that was a good idea or if we should just ignore Priest's Spell Compendium here. Daranios (talk) 19:18, June 10, 2016 (UTC)