Talk:Kobold

In Baldurs gate there deskribet as sounging like small dogs "Yipp'ing", should this be added? or is it changed? TerrorBlades 09:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

This is actually already mentioned in the language section of the article. Please remember that any details added from computer games are automatically considered non-canon, so they need to go in a separate section of the article and marked as such. Fw190a8 (talk &middot; contr) 19:59, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I would frequest that the information be changed to that of 5e. important points include that as of 5e, urdsa are simply a an occurence of a kobold bearting winngs at birth, the fact that yipyak is no longer reconized as a language in 5e, and that various points of their culture have changed drastically. thesimple fact that the most reliable source of information comes from the most recent release of the information makes the information from 5e trump the out of date and unreliable information from previous editions defunct. i would ask that you take this matter seriously, and take steps to rectify it. – User:Jacktoland


 * No. The current policy of the FRW, and its most likely policy for the future, is not to change or remove the valid lore of previous editions, but to keep it and add the lore of the current edition. That is, you play 5e and expect to find 5e lore, while I play 3e and expect to find 3e lore. So the FRW should contain both 5e and 3e lore, as well as 1e, 2e, and 4e. OTOH, our Canon policy says that in the event of conflict between editions, the lore of the latest edition should be given primacy, but the previous lore is not to be removed where possible. So, someone should just add the 5e lore on kobolds to the page, not change or remove the existing lore.


 * BTW, please check your talk page and respond there. And please sign your name on your messages. You can place your signature on a message with four tildes, ~ . — BadCatMan (talk) 14:55, April 15, 2017 (UTC)