Talk:Tiamat

Cleanup
I have removed the cleanup template. I am not sure why it was there, but it was hiding at the bottom of the page. The article doesn't seem to need cleaning up! Fw190a8 17:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * the revision that was flagged for cleanup looked like this, from December 21st. Zerak talk 20:46, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Ooh, ugly! I guess whoever cleaned it up just didn't remove the template. All is well and good with the article now though. Fw190a8 22:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Relationships
In which sourcebook is the relationship between Tiamat/ Bahamut and their Untheric aspects described in detail? "Dragons of Faerûn" isn´t very explicit. — User talk:41.43.219.158


 * Unknown User, for old skool info, check out Monster Mythology page 105-107... or 108 of the Faiths and Pantheons sourcebook, but there appears to be nothing about Bahamut only Tiamat :( ... thanks for adding to wiki, BTW... please include sources and pages... and create a profile :) Darkwynters (talk) 18:54, December 8, 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! I promise I´ll do better next time. — User talk:41.43.219.158


 * Tiamat gets a lot of detail in Powers and Pantheons, along with some stuff about her history with the Untheric pantheon.
 * BTW, I added signatures for your messages. — BadCatMan (talk) 00:29, December 9, 2012 (UTC)

Tiamat's place in the World Tree cosmology
Faiths and Pantheons places Tiamat's realm into Heliopolis. The Player's Guide to Faerûn contrarily puts her into the Dragon Eyrie and says that she resided in Zigguraxus before the collapse of the Untheric pantheon. No mention to resolve that contradiction is made. Are there any errata on this?

If not, how should we handle that? At the moment both variations are simply put next to each other. Should we keep that (and possibly add a footnote), or follow the younger (and to me more plausible) variant from the Player's Guide to Faerûn and relegate Heliopolis to a footnote, or to the Inconsistencies section, or...? Daranios (talk) 12:55, September 16, 2018 (UTC)
 * I just found [these Questions for Ed Greenwood], which explains a lot, but the question how to incorporate this into the article remains. Thanks for replies! Daranios (talk) 13:31, September 16, 2018 (UTC)

Good Article status

 * Correct
 * yes


 * Referenced
 * yes


 * Formatted
 * yes


 * Clean
 * yes


 * Nearly complete
 * yes


 * Policy-adherent/Demonstrative
 * yes