Category talk:Priests by deity

Priest vs. cleric
At the moment we have Category:Priests by deity and Category:Clerics by deity. As far as I can see they exist because the function of the former is about categorizing by occupation, the other about categorizing by class. Still, the vast majority (with an exception being druids?) of characters would be simultaneously in both (which is rarely applied). Do we really need/want that? As long as I do not hear more arguments for this separation I would rather see both merged into Category:Priests by deity, as the affiliation seems to me more about fluff than about the crunchy distinction by class. Daranios (talk) 14:38, June 29, 2015 (UTC)


 * Daran, technically I use priest for novel or video game characters and cleric is for actual source material characters... I agree, it does become a mess... personally, we need better rules on categorizing stat characters from novel/game ones... such as all clerics and druids fall under the priest (also novel/game ones) category... all warriors (for novel/game ones) are fighters, rangers, barbarian, warriors (3e), etc. Mages (Used for novel/game characters) are magic-users, wizards, sorcerers might ...though this leads to headaches, such as thieves vs. rogues... - Darkwynters (talk) 15:15, June 29, 2015 (UTC)


 * Ah, now I see where this is coming from and that it is linked to more complicated issues. Still, I would prefer in this limited (though still work-intense to sort out) case of ...by deity to use the more general "Priest", which would be applicable for both novel/game and sourcebook characters. Characters with a known class (like cleric) would still get those categories of course, but the ...by deity would be uniformely Category:Priests by deity. Because like me, I guess most readers that get to Category:Priests by deity will not expect that there is an additional Category:Clerics by deity which they could also browse in this regard. Daranios (talk) 20:08, June 30, 2015 (UTC)