Talk:Draegloth

Does it bear mentioning that 4e also included the Draegloth? Presenting them as an actually gendered species, it presented the Draegloth and the Draegloth Favored One (a female counterpart, whose picture is already included on this page) in the 4th Edition Forgotten Realms Campaign Guide. It also featured the Draegloth Abomination, a Draegloth born to a Drider mother (for those lost their sterility in 4th edition), in the Monster Manual 3.Ranime Codexer (talk) 19:23, July 22, 2019 (UTC)


 * I would say so, for sure! We tend to include information from FR-specific sources (such as the FRCG) over D&D (MM3), but all canon information is welcome to the article. Would you like to contribute? Ruf (talk) 21:31, July 22, 2019 (UTC)


 * I would like to, but I have no idea how to make those specific notes; the formatting that the FRWiki uses is unfamiliar to me, and I have never been good at working with pre-existing templates.Ranime Codexer (talk) 08:32, July 25, 2019 (UTC)


 * The first thing to know is that we recommend using the Source editor and not the Visual editor (you can set this in your preferences or click the Source icon while in the Visual editor) because it makes using the citation templates sooo much easier. To add the proper citation after you have written a passage, just type  followed by the name of the book. It will pop up with automatic suggestions that narrow down as you type until you can just pick the correct one from the list of choices. See Help:Citing sources for a full explanation, including how to add page numbers. You can also just look at what others have done and emulate it. The regular editors and admin staff are happy to answer your questions if you get stuck. There is also the Fandom video library on our Community page. Most importantly, have fun! &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 12:25, July 25, 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I just added Eclavdra Phann amnog known draegloths, but I don't know how to add references. Would someone please be so kind to add it? It's a web article of WotC http://archive.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/rp/20020814a many thanks LylaNikker (talk) 18:44, December 12, 2019 (UTC)


 * I gotchu! After I create the template and add it, just take a look at the template code by editing the page. Its super easy to add with the source editor. :) Ruf (talk) 18:56, December 12, 2019 (UTC)

Rephrasing of "unholy union"
I think the phrasing of the way draegloths are created ("unholy union" of a glabrezu and a newly ordained high priestess of the drow goddess Lolth) is confusingly worded.

Upon my first reading of this paragraph, I understood it as a glabrezu had to physically merge with a priestess to form a draegloth (the two becoming one being). Only upon reading the rest of the article and putting the pieces together did I understand that "unholy union" is supposed to refer to sexual intercourse.

I'm far from an expert on writing wiki articles, but I ask that the phrasing of being "created by the unholy union" be rephrased as to clearly convey the idea of reproduction, not a magical transformation of two beings into one.


 * Yes, it's a euphemism and a quote from the sourcebook, but it's not necessary so I've revised it to be more clear. How does "They were the progeny of coupling between..." sound? ~ BadCatMan (talk) 13:12, 12 May 2022 (UTC)