Talk:Rogue

I think we should create and redirect thief to rogue and categorize all thieves as such. Because this wiki follows, or at least seems to follow, 3.0/3.5 rules, it would retcon all the personalities who were left behind w/2nd ed. rules. Any thoughts?


 * I think seems sensible. Would we still list 2nd ed. character classes as "thief" and let the redirect do its job, or list them as "rogue" instead? Fw190a8 18:52, 12 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Listing them as thieves w/a redirect would stay truer to the source material IMO. Johnnyriot999 19:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)