Talk:Psionics

Category
This is categorized in the "Magic" category, but psionics are completely different. Whereas magic uses the Weave (or the Shadow Weave), psionics are mental powers. We should probably have a Category:Psionics, but I'll just decategorize it for now. Fw190a8 17:52, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Too Long
I think that this article is a bit too long, and does not need the part about Oblodra. I think we should list the different disciplines, not what psionics can do, like dimensional doors and other stuff. We could have separate articles about each discipline. That would make it more organized. ChaoticNeutral 23:46, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree with that. Johnnyriot999 05:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Class Chronicles
On the Wizards' website there are some articles about psionics in the FR, part of Class Chronicles by Eytan Bernstein. Here they are: The problem is that I don't know if they are canonical and if they can be used as sources. --193.205.206.26 08:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Psionics Across the Land - Cormyr, Evereska, Kaliesh-Erai, Halruaa, Sembia, the Shaar, Thindol
 * Psionic Classes Ardent, Divine Mind, Psion, Wilder, Erudite, Psychic Warrior, Soulknife, Lurk
 * Psionic Races and Classes Blues, Duergar, and Elans
 * Psionic Races and Classes Ghostwise Halflings, Githyanki, Mind Flayers, Yuan-ti, and Psionic Bestiary

Okay I added the correct discipline names. (TeliomBrainFreeze (talk) 03:53, May 29, 2014 (UTC))

Ki?
Hey, BadCatMan, FYI, articles referring to a monk's ki all link here, yet you removed reference to it from this article. ~ Lhynard (talk) 06:54, July 23, 2016 (UTC)


 * Ki's been a different thing in different editions; it's only 4th edition that called it psionic. Since the line was unreferenced, I removed it. I didn't know ki redirected to psionics, so I've restored it. — BadCatMan (talk) 07:23, July 23, 2016 (UTC)


 * Returning to this, I'd like to develop both ki and psionics for the wiki, but their apparent merger is a bit of a stumbling block. In 1st, 2nd, and 3rd edition they are distinctly separate and unrelated concepts with different themes and practiced by different classes in different ways. Then, complicating life as it always does, 4th edition seems to merge them.


 * But does it? Looking closely at the 4e Player's Handbook 3, the monk class has "Power Source: Psionic" and is the only one that requires a "ki focus" implement. The book talks almost wholly about monks using psionics and ki focuses. It mentions "ki" itself only once, as part of the description of ki focuses, describing it as an "inner magical energy". Meanwhile, psionics is described as a stray magic from the Far Realm (because 4e really can't help itself, and forgets psionics was previously an internal power and it wrecks the monk concept). The Monk playtest in Dragon #375 discusses how a ki power source was removed in favour of the psionic power source during design, but it doesn't try to equate ki and psionics. So, nowhere does it come out and say "ki = psionics", even though it overlaps the two to the point of being indistinguishable. In the end, 4e Monks use psionics and ki combined (as some 3e prestige classes did).


 * On that highly tenuous basis, I'd like to treat them separately. In any case, it would be much easier to write an article focusing on ki, eastern classes, and powers separate from the much greater body of lore on psionics, psionic classes, races, western traditions, Faerunian history, etc., etc., etc., rather than continually switching focuses and topics and going "Meanwhile, over in Kara-Tur..." Does this sound good to everyone? (I tag this as a Split proposal, but the article barely mentions ki yet.


 * Finally, does anyone know what 5th edition's perspective on psionics and ki is, if it has one yet? Are they still merged, separated again, or not yet mentioned / completely ignored? Thanks. — BadCatMan (talk) 10:18, September 19, 2017 (UTC)