Talk:Tyranthraxus

Aside from speculation in the 4th edition campaign guide that some of the Lost Gods might have been primordials, is there any concrete evidence that Tyranthraxus in particular was ever a primordial? It would make sense, given his association with fire and former demigod-like status, but I don't think canon bears it out enough for us to state so authoritatively. Or am I wrong? -- Rowan Earthwood 00:13, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm... upon analysis of the material you seem to be right. The Lost Gods are heavily implied to be primordials (particularly the ones already listed as such) but it isn't stated out-right that they necessarily are. So I'll remove the primordial reference for now unless more concrete information pops up.
 * You're right that it would make sense, and that's why I included it (along with the leap of logic) above. And it would be interesting, since he's lawful instead of chaotic or true neutral. But you are also correct that we probably don't have enough data to make a concrete judgment. Correcting. Niirfa-sa 09:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)