Category talk:Cosmology

Category: Locations?
Does the Cosmology category really belong in the locations category? I would say that cosmology is a concept rather than a place, although would concede that Category:Planes of existence could be in Category:Locations. Fw190a8 18:37, 17 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I think 'planes' should remain where it is, and this category should move to Category:Categories. I'd also suggest that a link be added to the front page as it is a rather important article. Any thoughts? Johnnyriot999 21:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)


 * No objections? Fantastico! Johnnyriot999 18:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Cosmology is already linked from the main page. Zerak talk 18:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Did not see that one. Thanks for pointing that out. Johnnyriot999 18:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Disguised as realmspace - deception worthy of Shar :o) Zerak talk 18:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Category Contents
Since cosmology is about the organization and relationship between the planes of existence, I think this category should be for "things related to more than one plane". If you agree, then I would remove individual planes like the Elemental Plane of Fire and the Prime Material Plane and add the River Styx, the River Oceanus (when I get around to writing it), Gate, Portal, plane shift, and perhaps even the Transitive Planes and Planewalking. You may come up with more. What do you think, sirs?&mdash;Moviesign (talk) 01:47, March 13, 2013 (UTC)


 * Sounds good to me, Movie... it did seem a little weird when I read the cosmology page and, so do you think Category:Planes of existence should be the master category for planes? Darkwynters (talk) 04:10, March 13, 2013 (UTC)