Talk:Guild thief

Should we merge guild thief with Shadow Thief of Amn?
Let's put aside the fact that there isn't an article for the second class yet.

I'm not necessarily in favor such a motion, but they're exactly the same prestige class, mechanics wise, except for the adjustment between 3.0 and 3.5 editions. But on the other hand, lore wise, they're quite different. One is a more generic, "guild thief" that could be of any guild whereas another is much more specific, with ties to Shar and the complicated politics of Amn. Niirfa-sa 02:55, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

I concur.
I agree with the previous statement. This class is just the Shadow Thief of Amn scrubbed for 3.5...however there isn't anything about the original that conflicts with the 3.5 ruleset so I say leave it at that.

I disagree.
This page in no way should be merged with the Shadow Thieves.

As the original poster noted, one has ties to a general guild while the other ties directly to the Shadow Thieves.

At the very least I could see the two having extreme similarities, but not the same all together.