User talk:Ruf67

Archive of older comments

 * Archive created on 2007-06-30

Inhabitants by alignment
You've been adding the category Inhabitants by alignment to many character entries, but I think the category be called something like Characters by alignment, since inhabitants refers to location, such as Inhabitants of Undermountain. --Ebakunin 23:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Requested Article
You have one for 'Mythrellan', is this Myth Rhynn your talking about? Or is it another Myth city?(Bloodtide)

Good stuff!
Good work on the War Wizards article and the corresponding disambiguation page. I think it makes a lot of sense this way around. Fw190a8 16:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Unmerge of Randal Morn
Daggerdale is a pretty self-contained area. I would prefer to keep all significant people and places within the core article until there is enough information written to warrant a fork; as per traditional wiki process. It's also easier to manage in to early stage of development.

I'm new here, so I'm unfamiliar with the guidelines regarding what should be under their own articles. Could you explain to me why you believe Morn should have his own article at this point? Gunslinger47 22:34, 21 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Sure thing. We tend to make an article for every individual character, place, thing, building, item etc. no matter how big or small. So depending on the ammount of information available, you'll find articles on this page of all types and sizes. Waterdeep for example is well-explored and thus is quite a legnthy article. Galaghard I is not mentioned too often therefore the article is rather small and, as of right now, is only a stub. Hope that explains my changing the articles a bit. Cheers! Johnnyriot999 22:41, 21 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Hmm... alright. I don't like seeing stubs or red links, but that must just be my Wikipedia bias. :) Gunslinger47 22:45, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Beg for help from a newbie
Hi, I noticed that an article linked to Matron Malice and many/most articles referred to Malice Do'Urden as Matron Malice, so I thought that a redirect was warranted. Despite copying text/code directly from working sources, I'm unable to get the page to properly redirect. Help? Sorry to bug you, but you were nice enough to offer to help out :) Nmathew 02:18, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Boots of speed
Dude, you're adding articles really fast. Did you cast improved haste on yourself? Kudos!--Caelis Moonflower 20:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Nhyris D'Hothek
Hi, Johnny, I saw you inserted questionmarks in the article about Nhyris D'Hothek regarding his class. I am not sure why you did so. The Serpent Kingdoms sourcebook states him to be "Male pureblood yuan-ti fighter 3/horned harbinger 1". (The sourcebook contradicts this later on describing him as a "lichlike" creature, something you would rather associate with a sorceror or wizard class than a fighter class.)--Caelis Moonflower 06:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

RE: Hardcastle
Darn, you are QUICK! ;-) I was doing more or less the same thing at the same time. You beat me to it, haha. :-) --Caelis Moonflower 20:18, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

RE: Pterafolk
Hi Johnny, I saw your changes made on the category of the Pterafolk, ranking them among the Pterafolk. But they fall in the lizardfolk category, just like Yuan-ti, Asabi's and Stingtails do. Or am I mistaken here?--Caelis Moonflower 20:03, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks and thanks for improving it, I didn't really know how to format things, so it looks a lot nicer now that you stuck your hands in XD

Hi
Haven't talked to any of you for a long time. Saying hi. I've been learning to play bass so I took a long break from editing. Quietdrive 18:28, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Notes v Reference
I've noticed you and I are having an edit war. (smiles) I thought references would be listed in a section called "references" but I've noticed you've changed them all to "notes". I defer to you as you're more experienced and knowledgable than I on this Wiki, but why Notes?Hurtzbad 12:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * We did talk informally about this a while back, and decided to use "Notes" for the tag (ie inline references in the page) and "References" for static references that apply to the entire article. Ideally there should only be inline references if we're working with well-sourced articles! There is no official policy on the issue, so neither way is officially right or wrong. If anyone has a preference for making a policy on the issue, do feel free to submit a proposal. Fw190a8 20:00, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Just going to chime in with my 2 cents : ). I'd prefer we put all citatins under References, for the sake of simplicity, and only use Notes for footnotes (which aren't really used here, currently). Zerak talk 20:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL, didn't realize this was such a sensitive issue.
 * Johnnyriot999, we're not waring, (thus the smile) I'd just noticed you and I had made some changes back and forth
 * Everyone, would it make sense, (since we have 4 people here who edit) to have a quick discussion page about referencing, notes, etc? Rather than use Johnnyriot999 discussion page?
 * BTW: I appologize for the confusion. I've started to use footnotes and thought they were References . I now have a better understanding, they are Footnotes or notes. (I'd prefer if we called then Footnotes, Notes to me means quick scraps of paper)
 * Hurtzbad 21:41, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome back
Long time no see! Feel free to stop by our new IRC chat channel! The invitation extends to anyone else reading this also! Fw190a8 20:03, 11 January 2008 (UTC)