Talk:Daggerford

Thanks for catching my mistake of "daggerfold". Johnnyriot999 03:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

OMG...
I don't know if i'm the only one but i can't edit this page at all the damn spam filter is f-in with me too much. The pic is not where it's supposed to be theres too many spaces and to many spaces after the periods. Pharuan Undearth 08:35, September 17, 2011 (UTC)


 * Spam filter? Is that one of Wikia's new "features?" (I fiddle with their CSS and some of their JavaScript with the GreaseMonkey and Stylish addons for Firefox). I think I've taken care of the issues you noticed, but if not, make a note here and I'll get right on it. Cronje (talk &sdot; contribs) 14:13, September 17, 2011 (UTC)


 * Ah, that's what you mean by the spam filter. Heh, I hit Submit in another tab and switched right over to this one before noticing it didn't go through. Goddamn Wikia! Cronje (talk &sdot; contribs) 14:15, September 17, 2011 (UTC)


 * After three attempts at fixing the stupid page, I finally found the messed-up character in the Notable Buildings section. *grumble* Cronje (talk &sdot; contribs) 14:20, September 17, 2011 (UTC)


 * If you were in front of me i would kiss you, even though your a guy, full on french. That's it you fixed it i have no idea what you did but thank you. It's annoying going through the "towns" again and having a floating pic. Not being able to change it. Again thank you. Pharuan Undearth 17:31, September 17, 2011 (UTC)

Check for copied text
Can someone please check if the Government section, using 5e sources, is copied or in original wording? Thanks. — BadCatMan (talk) 09:00, June 9, 2016 (UTC)


 * I looked over the passages tagged from Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide when I fixed the references and didn't see anything amiss (maybe even too loose an interpretation of the text). I don't have Scourge of the Sword Coast to check. The references might not be quite correct because there were two that were named ":0" so I took my best guess. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 12:38, June 9, 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks. — BadCatMan (talk) 12:40, June 9, 2016 (UTC)

Good Article status

 * Correct : Yes
 * Referenced : Yes
 * Formatted : Mostly (inconsistent header and list formats: please use level 4 headers, not definition markup and then use TOC limit if the ToC gets too big) yes (fixed)
 * Clean : Yes
 * Nearly complete : Yes
 * Policy-adherent/Demonstrative : Yes