User talk:78.19.14.249

I have rolled back your recent edits to the Asmodeus page. You have removed sourced content, introduced spelling and grammar errors, and messed up citations.

You seem to be knowledgeable about Asmodeus. If you feel that the article needs to be changed so drastically, please comment why on its Talk page. Whenever making large edits to an article, it is good form to do so, if you are new to a wiki community.

I have blocked you temporarily simply to save you from doing extra work. If you respond here or create a user account, I can unblock you.

~ Lhynard (talk) 21:10, July 24, 2020 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I don't really edit wikis and was unfamiliar with the format. I apologise for that.

I edited the page because it had edited several sources refering to asmodeus for a fact as a serpent when in fact his orgin story in meant to be ambigius. Him being an Angel or a god or a serpent is meant to be ambigious not a definite fact and asmodeus has not been referred to as a serpent in 5e 4e and its only mindly mentioned in 3.5.

Their are multiple sources on his origin and this article is about the second edition asmodeus not the modern asmodeus given its reference to several key figures who have not been mentioned since second edition.

I tried to edit it to reflect the multiple stories of asmodeus to show its ambigious. This article has updated sources that directly contradict each other in the article and treat asmodeus being a serpent as canon which it is not.