Template talk:Class table

Foo of NaN Level
Any chance we can make the table generate a category of "Foo of unknown level" instead of "NaN level" for cases when a class is specified without a class level? ~ Lhynard (talk) 17:09, April 2, 2016 (UTC)


 * I suppose, but I would just not specify the edition parameter and add whatever categories manually, since this is such an edge case. Do we really need a category for "unknown level"? They should be listed under "Category:Foo (3e)" for example, which should be sufficient. The edition parameter is used as a switch to turn on/off the category generation right now. If you really think it's worth it, I'll work on it. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 17:30, April 2, 2016 (UTC)


 * As an alternative then, is there a way to have a bot replace all instances of  with  ? I think I've got a bunch of such cases, but I couldn't begin to tell you which articles they are in. ~ Lhynard (talk) 18:28, April 2, 2016 (UTC)


 * That's certainly possible. Drop the details on my bot page and I'll add it to the list. — BadCatMan (talk) 04:31, April 3, 2016 (UTC)


 * I believe I just looked through all the Person pages that use the Class table and did not find any occurrence of NaN. If you can find me a page where it happens, please let me know. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 22:27, January 3, 2017 (UTC)


 * See Hazamir al Aktorral. I am glad to hear that this is rare, but I like to see auto-catting working for as many edge cases as we can. ~ Lhynard (talk) 23:18, January 3, 2017 (UTC)