Talk:List of sourcebooks in chronological order

Woah!
exactly what I wanted! :) ~ Lhynard (talk) 23:50, December 23, 2014 (UTC)


 * :) - Darkwynters (talk) 01:15, December 24, 2014 (UTC)

Months
Should we break this down further by month? ~ Lhynard (talk) 00:30, December 24, 2014 (UTC)


 * I was just thinking that might work since a lot of the sources are under the same year. - Darkwynters (talk) 01:15, December 24, 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for creating this page, I really like that! About the months, in my opinion, it would be nice to have them, but it only makes sense if we can find out the month for a reasonable part of the entries. I made one example with a month now, but I am not completely happy with it. Maybe it would be nicer to have the entries without months below the ones with months, as the former are somehow less well "time-applied". But then we would need a sensible heading for distinction. Daranios (talk) 14:55, December 28, 2014 (UTC)


 * I think it would be safe and reasonable to infer the months from publication order, provided enough sourcebooks do provide the month, rather than having a "month not specified section". We, after all, have assumed all Al-Qadim stuff is 1367 DR. ~ Lhynard (talk) 16:17, December 28, 2014 (UTC)