Forum:Prospoal: Adding "Physiology" as a new section to the standardized section organization scheme.

{{Forum post| Given recent edits and discussions, I am reviving this thread so we can have something of a resolution and a working standard for new and existing articles.

But first, a suggestion for what to call this new section:

We are trying to find a term that defines the internal mechanisms of creatures, as well as their interaction with their surroundings. There is a name for this kind of study: Cybernetics.

That would be my suggestion for a name to replace the Ecology section with, but it might be confusing to readers, since the word has taken a more technological meaning in pop culture.

If people strongly oppose to that (which I am assuming will be the case), I am in favor of replacing the Ecology section with Biology, since that makes a lot more sense for the sort of content that goes in there and is fine in most cases. In addition, I propose that "Uses", which tends to be used as a separate section when used, be made into a subsection of Biology.

The Biology section should contain only information that would not fit in other sections, such as Abilities or Combat. If a creature's nature is inherently magical and no biological reasoning applies to it, then that name would be a poor fit, but still better than Ecology or Physiology (in either case, Cybernetics would work fine… doesn't hurt to try).

That said, here is a proposal for the standard sections of creature articles (Appendix omitted):

Notable
(In the unlikely case that people actually like Cybernetics as a section title, it would then replace Biology)

Thoughts?
 * ― Sirwhiteout (talk) 02:04, September 25, 2020 (UTC)}}