Talk:Gods of the Pantheon

Should this page have an Organization template? Artemaz (talk) 19:14, June 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * That would make sense. It's a group of deities with a united goal, and, like for the Celestial Empire, the Organization template seems the most fitting to me. Daranios (talk) 19:19, June 21, 2016 (UTC)


 * Hmm, so I added the org infobox, but now I would have to delete Category:Gods of the Pantheon in favor of Category:Members of the Gods of the Pantheon in order for the 5 gods to show as members on the page. Or I could just add the new category without deleting the old, but then we would have two categories for the same thing.Artemaz (talk) 19:51, June 21, 2016 (UTC)


 * Tricky question. In this specific case I personally would leave "showmembers" empty in the template. With five members enumerated in the article text anyone who wants can find this information - it will break the routine, though. Daranios (talk) 19:53, June 22, 2016 (UTC)


 * I like that approach. Seems like the simplest solution. Artemaz (talk) 12:57, June 23, 2016 (UTC)


 * I debated long and hard on what infobox to use for a pantheon for the Celestial Empire, so I welcome an alternative opinion. Organization did seem to be the best, but the Celestial Bureaucracy is so very definitely an organization. In that case, even minor dragons, demons, and undead are members, so both "Members of the Celestial Bureaucracy" and "Gods of the Celestial Bureaucracy" are appropriate. So, anyway, I'm not sure the Celestial Empire is a good example for a more ordinary pantheon. — BadCatMan (talk) 13:18, June 23, 2016 (UTC)


 * The Celestial Bureaucracy seems much more complicated than the Gods of the Pantheon. The Pantheon literally has 5 members (all gods) and will never have more or less ... unless of course some bizarre "Time of Troubles" scenario happens in Zakhara. Artemaz (talk) 13:42, June 23, 2016 (UTC)