Category talk:Categories

I think that wes should chamge the "category:people" to "category:inhabitants of the realms". As it is more inclusive of ALL the things that live in the Realms. Any disagreements? Johnnyriot999 00:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Would this also extend to renaming the subcategories? For example, changing "Category:People by home" to "Category:Inhabitants by home"? Fw190a8 09:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I dont think I articulated my point well. What I mean is, because "category:people" is already a subcategory of "category:inhabitants of the realms", then to move "category:inhabitants of the realms" under "category:categories" (rather than just "category:people" being there) it would be more inclusive in that manner. Johnnyriot999 13:33, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see your point. In that case, definitely. One of the other points raised by using the term "people" was whether characters like orcs, drow and dragons can be deemed "people". In that respect, I feel that "inhabitants" is a more accurate term. Fw190a8 16:52, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Category:Timeline
I believe we should add a new subcategory here that encompasses all the history, roll of years and various timeline categories and articles etc. Any thoughts? Johnnyriot999 23:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

New Categroy Proposal
I just moved this Category:Alignment into the root category, as it was uncategorized, but I was wondering if a category regarding characters (not people/inhabitants as discussed above) would be more appropriate. This could also include articles regarding feats, skills, etc. Basically I'm just wondering whether or not it would be worth creating this category, whether that would be considered crunch or not. If the only information that it would include is that about alignments then I dont see the point but if the other character information is not considered crunch then I believe it is needed. Johnnyriot999 08:24, 12 May 2007 (UTC)