Template talk:Canon

Thoughts?
Thoughts on this as a replacement for Video game? In action at my user page. This is just a rough take that lacks some functionality, but this is generally how I envision the look of the template. The benefit of this template is two-fold: it takes up significantly less screen real estate than Video game, and it allows us to consolidate all the Video game variants into one template. --Ir&#39;revrykal (talk) 06:38, April 16, 2016 (UTC)


 * I like it. It's more discreet than the equivalent, NWN, and the game symbol is easily recognisable, whereas the box image is unnecessary. We don't have a consistent style for page labels, however, so when we do, this would probably be changed to whatever style is ultimately adopted. — BadCatMan (talk) 07:25, April 16, 2016 (UTC)


 * I like it also, more than the previous version. However, for me it actually takes up MORE screen height than the previous version, so I don't know that it satisfies your original goal. ~ Lhynard (talk) 17:19, April 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * Odd. What resolution are you using? --Ir&#39;revrykal (talk) 10:41, April 18, 2016 (UTC)

Lacking icons
Regarding Blood & Magic: the solution for an image here is going to have to be either a) crafting an icon of sorts, b) using cover art, or c) using a generic icon. This also applies to other older games, I guess. I'll see what I can do. --Ir&#39;revrykal (talk) 10:41, April 18, 2016 (UTC)


 * I had some ideas for a B&M icon: an obelisk or a foundation stone from the game. I have screenshots I can tinker with. Mostly, I just realised we didn't have a template for B&M, so I decided to use yours as it was adaptable. :) — BadCatMan (talk) 10:59, April 18, 2016 (UTC)

Parameters
I replaced  and   with a single unnamed parameter, but didn't do anything else. Note that all the  statements need to have the same choices, but right now the last one has   which the others don't have. I would also add a  to each of the switches in case the template is called without an argument, or someone commits a typo. Let me know if you want me to make any further changes or if you want to flex your template muscles. ;-) &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 15:26, April 18, 2016 (UTC)
 * Excellent. Thank you. --Ir&#39;revrykal (talk) 15:33, April 18, 2016 (UTC)

Categorization
The current canon templates place articles in game-specific articles. Is this something that should be continued? Personally, I don't really see the value in maintaining, say, Category:Neverwinter Nights: Shadows of Undrentide. Especially since we don't categorize articles based on source in any other case than with video games. To me, these categories seem like a relic of the wiki's 2007 era, and I would be in favor of removing them entirely. --Ir&#39;revrykal (talk) 16:20, April 18, 2016 (UTC)