Talk:Sargasso (wildspace)

Better Title?
Cool article, but can we come up with a better disambiguation word than "spelljammer"? I think that "dead-magic zone" is properly the best, but it's long. Maybe just "zone"? How about ("wildspace")?

My reasoning is that I feel that such words should either A) be a category or B) be a location associated with the title. "Spelljammer" is neither.

~ Lhynard (talk) 04:54, June 14, 2018 (UTC)


 * How about "region"? &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 13:12, June 14, 2018 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I agree. I was having trouble coming up with a better disambiguation word last night too. "Region" can also be a problem because there are equatorial sargassos on Karpri as well (the regular, mundane type), which are important enough that they could in principle get an article of their own. I like "dead-magic zone" best, but, if length is an issue, "wildspace" sounds pretty good too. ― Sirwhiteout (talk) 13:33, June 14, 2018 (UTC)


 * Yeah, "(spelljammer)" implies it's a type of spelljammer. What about "Realmspace" or just "space"? — BadCatMan (talk) 06:16, June 15, 2018 (UTC)


 * Ok, so if these things don't appear anywhere else, then I think "wildspace" or "space" are the best choices. If they do, then "Realmspace" might be better. I haven't seen any mention of these regions in any other Spelljammer sourcebook, but I haven't looked very thoroughly.


 * If people agree, I can move it to one of those options later today (between those, I'd go with "wildspace"). I have no strong preference otherwise. ― Sirwhiteout (talk) 12:57, June 15, 2018 (UTC)


 * I prefer "wildspace" to "space" also. ~ Lhynard (talk) 13:17, June 15, 2018 (UTC)