User talk:Marvelous25

Red Links
Please do not remove links to pages that reasonably might be created later. That's the whole idea behind a wiki&mdash;that it can be expanded by others. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 16:45, 17 November 2020 (UTC)


 * So if a page exists, for the actual thing under a name for which it is referred to (brimstone=sulfur, sulfur=brimstone), then it's preferable to ignore the already existing page that it could be linked to, and instead have a red link directing to a page that may or may not be created (and if it did it would be directing to the same information cause it's essentially the same thing and used interchangeably)? And that earns me a block, seriously?Marvelous25 (talk) 16:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The block was to save you (and us) unnecessary effort and to get your attention. It has been rescinded. In the future, please use the Talk page to discuss questions or disagreements on the content of a page.
 * The brimstone page was a redirect to an individual dragon with Brimstone as a nickname (which was inappropriate for the scent of brimstone) and that has now been corrected to redirect to "sulfur". I believe Artyom.pavlov plans to make articles for both ham and sulfur, so that's why he reverted your edits. Can we consider this matter closed? &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 17:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Would it not have been easier to stick that on my talk page in the first page, rather than blocking me and talking down to me by telling me about 'the whole idea behind a wiki'?Marvelous25 (talk) 17:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)