User talk:Zerak-Tul

Nice to have you with us. Deity entries could do with a little more detail but it's best to get the entries started in this case, otherwise they're great so far! --hash

RE: High Harpers. No damage done, so no worries. --hash

thanks, if you have a gmail, mine is davidalexandrov@gmail.com


 * lol, well, your choice. anyway, i added you and we will be able to chat.

Thanks for the advice. I am a very enthusiastic Forgotten Realms and DnD player, but unfortunatly I know next to nothing about wikis (took me a while to even figure out how to message you back, and I'm not even sure if I'm doing it right!), so whenever you see something I could be doing better, drop me a line on how I can fix it. Thanks again, I look forward to making many contributions. --Jefe De Jefes 22:02, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Main Page Discussion

 * I agree with the categories on the main page being got rid of. It was User:Poulsen's doing, I had no input into it.
 * I suppose you're right about the blobs of info (except the bit about my cwk being exciting). At the time I just wanted everyone to know why I wasn't editing much. Seems moot now as I can never seem to be able to get much editing done.
 * You can spearhead an article improvement drive if you want to. I don't really think we have enough editors though.
 * Putting Famous Conflicts into just plain Conflicts is fine.
 * Same with the books/authors catagories hash 02:33, 23 August 2006 (GMT)


 * Also, having links to varies novels/source books/rpg's on the front page (possibly with exterior links and ISBN numbers to people interested in buying) could probably go a little way towards the Wizards not starting to get over protective of their copyright.
 * Everyone loves free advertising ;) Zerak-Tul 06:15, 23 August 2006 (UTC)