User:Cell4

D&D is one of the greatest games of all time. I've run many adventures. My first D&D campaign was run in early 2006. Before that I was a player character. Also, my favorite Dungeons and Dragons Campaign Setting is Greyhawk, if you'd count it. I count it as a campaign setting because I like it. I love the D&D rulebooks (especially the first two of the core three) and my favorite is the Dungeon Master's Guide. You can guess that I'm a DM. As I said, I've run many adventures. Forgotten Realms is not a campaign setting that I use, because our gaming group has a rule: Greyhawk only. But still, this is a great wiki and I intend to stay here as long as I can. There may sometimes be periods where I do not contribute, because I'm very busy at times. I'll try my best.

D&D
Note: This part of my userpage is considered to be more of a place for chat. I'm not exactly a fan of a certain one of the campaign settings but I'll try to stay off of such negative subjects. If anyone here plays D&D a lot, they may agree with me. I'm happy right now (April 13) because one of my characters went from 1st level to 3rd in ONE adventure. He's a rogue. I like their sneak attack. I'm not a big fan of any characters that use spells (bard, cleric druid, paladin, sorcerer, and wizard, so I'm limited in classes. Rogue is my favorite. Also there are monk and fighter, both decent classes. I don't like barbarian either, because they, despite good hit points, are, well, barbaric.

Actually, I tried playing a wizard, and they are OK. Sorcerers are bad. I've made a lot of prestige classes as a DM. These are my four favorites: arcane instructor, inferno master, scourge and wavemage. All the rest are bad. But I'm particularly proud of the scourge. If anyone wants stats for these classes to use in their game, leave a message on my talk page. I'm going to be buying Complete Mage and Complete Arcane for rules on arcana and more prestige classes for my gnome illusionist. --Cell4, 1 May 2007.

Complete Mage is now mine. I'm just going to say that anyone who wants to can leave a message here instead of on my talk page. Be warned, here barbarians and all divine spellcasters are insulted. I feel like ranting. Mr. Welch's list (which User:Zerak-Tul recommended and I read) is really funny if you hate some of the classes, or if you need a laugh. you should really try it out. But, on a completely different subject, I'm angry. Some prestige classes really take a while to get to, with not so good rewards. For example: the loremaster. The blackguard is an example of a worthwhile prestige class. Same with the archmage and the red wizard, which is actually a very good one. I make my own prestige classes. Also, I make new base classes. Wavemage is the best, despite what is said above. They use supernatural powers, not magic, and are even better than inferno masters (another class I made) which was never to great anyway. Again, if you want me to give you stats for this class, I'd be happy to. I'd be glad if other people besides the other four people in my D&D group used these classes. --Cell4, 5 May 2007.

I have been looking around at hobby stores lately. I love most hobby stores. But there is this one hobby store where I live that sells rpgs from the 70s and 80s which is freakin awesome, to me. Have you seen the shit that wotc churns out these days? Examples: complete champion, drow of the underdark, and pretty much all of the novels, knowing that Philip athans writes pretty much all of them. I only like the books that I own (PH, DMG, and Complete Mage); that's why I own them. TSR did some good stuff, you have to admit. The adventures that tsr made can be tweaked to be made compatible with v 3.5. DrizztTheSlayer 00:06, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about the forum I created about athans if it offended anyone. But he's either insane, on drugs, a criminal or all of the above. If I didn't know better i'd say an eleven year old with anger management wrote those excuses for books. ChaoticNeutral 23:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Dragonlance
This is where I talk about Dragonlance. Now this campaign setting is horrible misunderstood. just because wotc does not like it much for use anymore does not mean it's bad. There is a certain book out their called Dragons of the Dwarven Depths by Margaret Weis and Tracy Hickman. I started reading it a couple of days ago and no offense to forgotten realms obsessives, but compared to it most of the drizzt books look like crap. The FR campaign setting is so old that the new stuff that comes out is complete garbage. They've arleady done like 20 books about drizzt, so what's with this new trilogy? And they have Phil athans as chief editor- wtf? --chaotic neutral

Reading the first dragonlance book published now, after i finish a small SW book Path of Destruction by DrewK --chaoticneutral