Talk:Order of the Blue Moon

Class or organization
Any thoughts on whether these prestige classes should be under both Category:Prestige classes and Category:Organizations... feels like they should be separate and have a disambiguation... - Darkwynters (talk) 22:29, March 17, 2015 (UTC)


 * I think the prestige class and organization should be separate, because you don't have to be a member of the prestige class to be a member of the organization (squires, priests, secretaries, folks who tend to the griffons, etc.). Apparently in this case, there is an Order of the Blue Moon, so you don't even need a disambiguation page. The articles should refer to each other and be self-explanatory. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 00:52, March 18, 2015 (UTC)


 * I don't want to mess with this article without a consensus. I actually think "Order of the Blue Moon" and "Knight of the Blue Moon" should be the same article, similar to Red Wizards.


 * My argument would be that you do not have any members of the order who are not knights, as it is a knightly order. Thoughts on this one? Ruf (talk) 17:02, August 1, 2020 (UTC)


 * I agree with Ruf on these things, I think. Prestige classes are nothing but crunch. You do not need to be a fighter to be a fighter either.


 * It is different when a group, like the Harpers, has multiple kinds of specific roles, like agents and priests.


 * ~ Lhynard (talk) 18:26, August 1, 2020 (UTC)