Category talk:Language isolates

Hi ThunderBrine. I also don't see a need for this category. One, it's too technical a subdivision and not one that anyone reading the wiki is going to need. Two, it seems speculative, just including languages that you assume are isolates without evidence either way, when they could well be connected to other languages. BadCatMan (talk) 09:52, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

This one I feel more confident in keeping because many other languages related to others one way or another, thus making them easy to find. These languages are harder to find on the wiki because they are usually only found on one race, and don't really offer much information on what language they're related to, whether it be their script or their lineage. If Wizards of the Coast were to give information on these languages' lineage, then removal would be appropriate from this category. Consequently, the languages that are language isolates are the ones with the least information, so it might be a good idea to have a category to keep track of these pages that won't show up a lot on other pages. ThunderBrine 10:15, 15 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The fact that the articles on these languages are lacking in information&mdash;or indeed, as the case may be, that these languages have little associated lore in published material&mdash;does not make them language isolates. That is a baseless assumption that has no place on the wiki. Ir&#39;revrykal (talk) 10:33, 15 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Yeah. The only confirmed language isolate I know of is Kuong language, and while languages isolates in themselves are interesting, I don't see a need for a separate category. Moreover, these languages are always mentioned or linked to on the creature pages, and are found in Category:Languages, so they are not difficult to find on the wiki. Therefore, I shall remove the category. BadCatMan (talk) 10:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)