Talk:Xan

Marking non-canonical section
You can't use the "BG" tag here, because it applies to the whole article; it speaks of the whole article, and it puts the article in the category of wholly non-canonical articles. That inapproriately ignores the part that applies to the novel. Right? Ville V. Kokko 20:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

My mistake. Thanks for the catch. Johnnyriot999 21:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Did Xan die in 1368 DR? Barteomir 13:03, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Canonically, yes. hashtalk 13:48, 30 August 2008
 * Which means it shouldn't say that in the infobox or anything, because that's based on the game. Ville V. Kokko 07:18, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

5th
Minsc and Boo has him as an 8th level wizard bladesinger and...he seems very much alive which is rather odd.Heartlesslove93 (talk) 05:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Same answer as before. M&B is not considered to be canon. See my response to Irenicus' Talk page. -Artyom.pavlov (talk) 05:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

It isn't? WOTC said anything published in 5th edition is canon to 5th edition to an extent (https://dnd.wizards.com/dndstudioblog/dnd-canon)(https://www.dmsguild.com/product/365114/Minsc-and-Boos-Journal-of-Villainy-5e). Not meaning to argue about this but it seems WOTC disagress with this. I get the book is full of strange things but...honestly not sure what makes it uncanon besides people not liking it. And....it contradicting making it not canon isn't solid either, D&D 5th contradicts alot as it goes on, and a lot of that is offically done. I agree with it being iffy, that handled canonicty stupidly this edition. Heartlesslove93 (talk) 05:55, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * It's all explained on the link I left for you on Irenicus talk page. The status can change down the road. -Artyom.pavlov (talk) 06:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)