Talk:Wolf's Pelt Inn

Just out of interest. Why should there be footnotes, if it is just a very short article with just one mentioning and the site given in the Reference? It is very unlikely that this place is somewhere else mentioned and that there will be more details than those RAS invented for one small unimportant (background) place in a little adventure. If I transform it into a whole reference thing together with footnotes, the part for this would be much bigger than the small piece of information in the article. Wouldn't that be a little bit too overdone? Besides if there is a need for a footnote, why do there this ugly tag note into it, if you just could have created the footnote with the reference itself, it already has the right page given ;) Historicus 14:05, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

Ok (Bloodtide 04:01, December 16, 2009 (UTC))