Talk:Akadi

Alignment Template Use
I've always thought that the alignment grid template is best used when displaying a range of alignments, such as "cleric alignments". The single alignment of a character or a deity looks better shown only as text. What does everyone else think? --Ebakunin 02:56, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Interesting, I hadn't thought of it like that. I admit that I created the template to avoid the unsightly mess of text when listing multiple alignments, but then again I quite like the way it looks even when only 1 alignment is being shown. Anyone else? Fw190a8 06:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Deity vs Primordial template
There is nothing really special about the Primordial template, except that it generates the Category:Primordials. I would just use the full Deity template, add the category by hand, and explain in the text about the revelation of being a Primordial.

P.S., I could add a parameter to the Deity template, something like primoridal = yes, and generate the category and anything else folks might want about Primordial status in the infobox. Just another thought. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 00:27, January 10, 2017 (UTC)


 * I would make Primordial a pass-through to Deity, but it should definitely not exist as it does now. ~ Lhynard (talk) 07:45, January 10, 2017 (UTC)


 * Just agreeing: I would be happy with any solution that, in contrast to now, allows space for the 1st through 3rd edition information on the primordials-formerly-known-as-deities. Daranios (talk) 19:54, January 10, 2017 (UTC)


 * Ok, I'll fix up the templates when I get home tonight. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 19:58, January 10, 2017 (UTC)
 * Can you fix that "yes" in the template? It kills all the immersion of the article (see Bazim-Gorag for an example).--Zeromaru X 00:06, January 13, 2017 (UTC)


 * That was the simplest solution, but obviously not the best. I moved it into the same area where the deity status is located. Better? &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 01:24, January 13, 2017 (UTC)