Talk:Gorar al-Aksar

How Kits Work
I don't know much about kits, but I thought they were basically variations on standard classes. Is this the case? If so, is this guy really level 30? It seems to me the Class table should only include. Thoughts? ~ Lhynard (talk) 20:13, May 23, 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, you are correct, this makes it look like he is dual-classed. I think I did this somewhere without stopping to think about it. We could make Category:Barbers (2e) a subcat of Category:Thieves (2e) to show the relationship between the kit and the class, but we don't do this for prestige classes (that I know of). At the very least we should have a Main or a descriptive link on the category page to an article that explains what a Barber is. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 21:19, May 23, 2015 (UTC)


 * Prestige classes are different; they are actually unique classes. They just have fancy prerequisites. So one would be a, say, a Druid 5/Berrydancer 3, a dual-classed character with a total character level of 8.


 * I think your subcategory idea would fix this issue.


 * HEY, DARKY!


 * ~ Lhynard (talk) 21:41, May 23, 2015 (UTC)


 * I "heart" the subcategory idea... so Movie can you demonstrate this idea on a page, such as Gorar al-Aksar :) - Darkwynters (talk) 00:45, May 24, 2015 (UTC)


 * I just did what I said above and removed Thief from the Class table, then added Barbers (2e) as a subclass of Thieves (2e). This guy is a Barber so we should only give him credit for that, and not an additional 15 levels of Thief. As I understand it, Kits are just different flavors of a class, but we are treating them like a class for categorization purposes so people can find examples of, say, Barbers. The subclass connection just pins the kit to the class it modifies. I hope that makes sense to everybody. It sounded good in my head. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 01:17, May 24, 2015 (UTC)