Talk:Geographical index of Toril

Improvements
I made a few "improvements" to this page, but some red links are lost when you report only the pages that already exist. I'd like to hear some opinions about this page and my changes. Do you think "Forests of Toril" and similar groupings should be their own page rather than lumped in here? If we keep the category-like lists, how would you suggest listing the red-link pages that are still needed? Or should red links be left out, as long as they appear in a page somewhere to be found? &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 01:51, May 28, 2014 (UTC)


 * Wow, Movie!!! I will look at this more tomorrow... but it looks awesome just at a glance :) - Darkwynters (talk) 04:40, May 28, 2014 (UTC)


 * TBH, this is another page I don't really see the point of. It's a bunch of lists of random stuff and category outputs, but they're never really going to be complete (as there's always something else), or will contain non-notable entries (Adhe Wood is pretty minor as forests go on Toril). Plus, reading out categories will inevitably produce planar locales or locales on other worlds. Some of these could be listed on Toril or Faerûn, or the like, or pages could just link to the relevant categories. — BadCatMan (talk) 09:38, May 28, 2014 (UTC)


 * The lists will be as complete and accurate as our categories, except for red links. This page would be nearly impossible to maintain if you had to add each geographical location one at a time by hand. At least these lists will dynamically update as new pages are categorized. You won't get locales on other planes because I specified Category:Locations on Toril as part of the function call. Putting these lists on other pages is easy if you think that would be better. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 21:18, May 28, 2014 (UTC)