Category talk:Fey

Why is there a Fey (3e) and a Fey (5e) categories, but no Fey (4e) or Fey (origin) category? It seems only logical, even if 4e was terrible and we want to pretend it never existed.

Additionally, if such a category is created, would it be possible to set it to auto-categorize from the infobox, please?

Good day. --SilverTiger (talk) 13:28, September 16, 2020 (UTC)


 * Because Fey is an origin in 4e, it does not need to be disambiguated with the Fey types, so Fey (4e) is definitely not the right way to go in my opinion.


 * As for Fey (origin), because origin is only a thing in 4e, I do not see the need for Fey (origin). The Fey category is already listed as both Creatures by type and Creatures by origin, so it is possible for 4e players to find anything with the Fey origin. I would not be opposed to adding a Fey (origin) category, but I am not in favor of it either, because I do not see a significant value to it.


 * If you put Fey in the origin4e field, it already is categorized as Fey. All the 4e origin auto-categories function right now. Yes, if Fey (origin) were agreed upon to be added, we can and should make it automatic.


 * ~ Lhynard (talk) 19:26, September 16, 2020 (UTC)


 * My reasoning for the Fey (origin) category is that the Fey (5e) and Fey (3e) categories make it easy to find fey that are from those editions. A similar category for 4th edition would be similarly helpful for users. 1e and 2e are left out because fey is not a formal description/category of any sort in either edition.--SilverTiger (talk) 21:47, September 16, 2020 (UTC)