User:Moviesign/ArchiveTalk2022

Archives: 2011, 2012, 2013–14, 2015, 2016, 2017

As of this date, there were 24,202 articles on the FR Wiki, 7,221 files, and 65,958 total pages. My edit total was 26,478 / 27,247 depending on which number you believe. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 05:30, January 1, 2018 (UTC)

Page Range on citations
Thanks for the tip. i was unaware it was required. Cheers! --Regis87 (talk) 15:06, January 9, 2018 (UTC)


 * The default value should be the entire range of pages, then people can cite the whole article (like you do with your Further Reading entries) or they can add a page number argument to cite a specific page as needed. Good work! &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 15:15, January 9, 2018 (UTC)

Enabling Discussions?
Hi there Moviesign! I noticed that your community was not yet using Discussions, our Forum feature replacement we developed for our communities last year. We realize your community does not currently use Special:Forums but please consider allowing us to enable Discussions anyway, as it provides more benefits to your community than it's predecessor. We have already switched all new communities to Discussions and are manually enabling it on established communities who are interested in having the feature available for their users.

Discussions is a feature that users can use to post questions, thoughts, images, links and even videos. They can upvote posts and even share them on social media. Users can edit their posts for the first 24 hours, but Admins and Moderators can edit posts anytime. Users can report posts they feel do not comply with our guidelines, or that of the community. Admins and Moderators can remove them. We give you the tools you need to monitor reported posts and users that report them. Since the introduction of Discussions, we have seen a pretty big increase in community interaction. You can find more information on Discussions here: http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Discussions

Let me know if your community would like to have Discussions enabled on the community and the app. I would be happy to take care of it for you. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. Jamie (profile)•(talk) 21:14, January 10, 2018 (UTC)

Page Deletion
Page Deletion: Narabatun Jungle There is one line of info, no references, and no mention of it in my sourcebooks (Maztica Campaign Set). May I humbly propose that this page be deleted?--SilverTiger12 (talk) 23:16, January 25, 2018 (UTC)
 * In general, yes you may. The best way to do so is to put a Deletion template at the top and give a reason why you think it should be deleted, like so: However, in this case, the Narabatun Jungle is an actual location that is described in the Endless Armies adventure. I'll add a reference to it and save it from deletion ;) &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 01:12, January 26, 2018 (UTC)

Generic classes and class tables
Certain AD&D Trading Cards give only generic 2e classes for their subjects ("Warrior" instead of "Fighter" or "Paladin", for example). In most cases the card description implies a certain subclass, but other times not. What do I do in these cases? Fill in Class table with the generic class, thereby generating "Category:Warriors of X level (2e)", or should I categorize them according to "common sense" (for example, Udall Granitecrusher is obviously a Fighter, but it's not really stated). --Ir&#39;revrykal (talk) 09:35, February 22, 2018 (UTC)


 * Yeah, warriors didn't become an actual class (for NPCs) until 3e, so I would just leave off the edition parameter of Class table and it will not generate any categories, put in, and then add Category:Warriors (2e) by hand. If you can infer the correct class, then go ahead and use the full Class table and maybe add a Note on how you came to that conclusion. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 13:55, February 22, 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I will do that. --Ir&#39;revrykal (talk) 14:47, February 22, 2018 (UTC)

Coding for infobox titles
Seeing as you are the most recently active admin on here, riddle me this: what part of this wiki's MediaWiki.css coding for infobox titles (such as this allows them to appear the way they are? SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 04:24, February 28, 2018 (UTC)


 * Everything labeled with  and perhaps things that are inherited from the overall infobox and/or wikia's CSS. Do you have a specific question about styling I can help you with? &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 14:15, February 28, 2018 (UTC)

Category rename
Hey, Moviesign. I want to move Category:Images from the Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting 3rd edition to the more accurate location of Category:Images from Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting 3rd edition, but the category rename function appears to be missing from the drop-down menu (when using Oasis/Wikia). Has access been restricted to admins, or has the feature been removed? Whatever the case may be, could you give me a hand using some bot magic? --Ir&#39;revrykal (talk) 20:04, March 26, 2018 (UTC)


 * Sorry to interrupt, but I think the category is correct as it is. The published sourcebooks refer to it as the Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting. For that matter, it is properly the Player's Handbook, the Dungeon Master's Guide, and the Monster Manual. See the "What You Need to Play" section of any FR sourcebook that has one, for example, on p. 4 of Silver Marches. This is consistent for every sourcebook I've looked at. ~ Lhynard (talk) 20:20, March 26, 2018 (UTC)


 * Hm, I'm not so sure. The format used in these categories seems to be "Images from [title]", and there is no definite article in the title. It's a category name, intended only for navigational purposes, not an attempt at a full sentence. For example, Wikimedia has the category Images from Encyclopædia Britannica, but the Wikipedia page for the Encyclopædia Britannica refers to it as "The Encyclopædia Britannica" in the article body. --Ir&#39;revrykal (talk) 22:47, March 26, 2018 (UTC)


 * I believe it depends on whether there is a book-like noun in the title or not, and how we read the noun. We say "Images from Silver Marches" because that's a straightforward title. However, "Images from the Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting" requires 'the' because it refers to the campaign setting. It's equivalent to "Images from the Forgotten Realms campaign setting" and "Images from the campaign setting of the Forgotten Realms", where you can see 'the' is required for 'campaign setting'. Similarly, in "Images from the Player's Handbook", we refer to the Handbook. In "Images from the Book of Exalted Deeds" we refer to the Book. It doesn't apply to "Images from Libris Mortis" or "Images from Encyclopædia Britannica" because the title is in a different language and the rules seem a bit softer. — BadCatMan (talk) 07:57, March 27, 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes, exactly. ~ Lhynard (talk) 11:40, March 27, 2018 (UTC)


 * Alright, I understand. I thought the format was strictly "Images of X", that's why I didn't think the definite article was necessary. Sorry for making you all write these explanatory paragraphs! :) I suppose this means that the opposite should happen: categories for other similarly titled works, for example Category:Images from Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide, should be changed to have "the" where appropriate. Thank you for the detailed explanation. --Ir&#39;revrykal (talk) 14:25, March 27, 2018 (UTC)


 * No worries! As far as renaming things like Category:Images from Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide, I had actually considered this a while ago. :) But I decided that there were far more important matters to deal with first. :) ~ Lhynard (talk) 14:37, March 27, 2018 (UTC)


 * To answer your first question with a question, is Personal Javascript enabled in your Preferences? You need that to be able to run the category rename function. But you, Lhynard, and anyone else that has an opinion need to work out if this is really necessary. Is there any benefit to renaming this category, other than aesthetics? If not, then I don't see the need myself. The extra "the" doesn't confuse anyone, whether is it strictly correct or not. But I like consistency, so I won't cry either way :) &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 01:32, March 27, 2018 (UTC)
 * I didn't have personal JavaScript enabled, however the option is still missing after turning it on (the drop-down only lists VisualEditor, History, and Talk). Anyway, I will halt my request since there's clearly no consensus at the moment. Like you said, it's just a minor matter of consistency. Not a big deal at all. --Ir&#39;revrykal (talk) 07:14, March 27, 2018 (UTC)


 * Oh, sorry, there is one more thing you have to do, because we have not made this tool available to the whole wiki. You have to add the following to your  file:

importArticles({   type: 'script',    articles: [ /* This will allow a user to rename a category. Use with caution */        'u:dev:CategoryRenameAuto-update/code.js'    ] });
 * PLEASE use this with extreme caution, because it will not only rename a category, but every link to that category on every page. This becomes very tricky when some categories are automatically generated by a template and some are added by hand. With great power comes great responsibility ;) &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 13:27, March 27, 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see! It appears I can access the tool now. I will use it with the utmost caution, and only for obvious cases/where consensus is well established. Thank you so much! --Ir&#39;revrykal (talk) 14:25, March 27, 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks for this, Movie. ~ Lhynard (talk) 14:37, March 27, 2018 (UTC)

Information Template for Audio Files
So I tried to make Information/Audio, so that I can start attributing audio files of pronunciations. I made it as a pass-through to Information, but I didn't do a very good job. I'm feeling too tired to solve any further bugs in my coding tonight, so I thought I'd give you a heads up, since templates are your thing. I don't think any image files are messed up, but I failed to get Information/Audio to not categorize itself. Also, I realize now that we should globally change all the Category:Public domain images and the like to Category:Public domain files. Or you can just scrap the whole idea and let me know an alternative to what I did here: File:Remorhaz.ogg. Sorry/thanks. ~ Lhynard (talk) 04:12, May 11, 2018 (UTC)


 * You were just tired. It only needed &lt;includeonly&gt; tags. I did add the screenshot parameter, since you could record something directly from the source. Not sure what copyright status that would have. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 12:53, May 11, 2018 (UTC)


 * Duh. Thanks! ~ Lhynard (talk) 17:42, May 14, 2018 (UTC)

Bot Requests
I have a few bot requests:
 * Replace all  with.
 * Rename  to   and then replace all   with.

Thanks!

~ Lhynard (talk) 18:24, May 14, 2018 (UTC)


 * Done! Let me know if you find any problems. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 00:14, May 15, 2018 (UTC)


 * You are amazing! ~ Lhynard (talk) 00:23, May 15, 2018 (UTC)

Tables
I just created a category for tables to make it easier for me to find them: Category:Table templates.

I had a few questions:
 * Is there any real purpose for List table? It seems far simpler just to use . Can we delete this one?
 * I am confused about the distinction among the following tables. Can they be merged?
 * Numeric table
 * Plain table
 * Split table

~ Lhynard (talk) 22:40, May 26, 2018 (UTC)


 * The only use for List table is if we change it to be right-aligned and/or mess with the formatting (like use a smaller font, say). Otherwise, &lt;br /&gt; tags work fine. Well, one other thought: if it was used consistently on a set of pages, it could be used for a DPL query, but I don't see that happening.


 * It looks like Split table has made the other two obsolete, since it allows the user to pick the column alignments instead of using the fixed ones in Numeric table and Plain table. They can probably be deprecated. BCM might have a comment, since Plain table is his. &mdash;Moviesign (talk) 02:34, May 27, 2018 (UTC)


 * It is? Huh. :) I think I wanted a bland, un-formatted table for a list of prices on an item one day, and none of the other tables were playing nice, so I took one and stripped it back. It's been used in a bunch of things since then, so I guess it was useful. That was back in 2014, so we might have something better now. — BadCatMan (talk) 05:00, May 27, 2018 (UTC)