Talk:Anauroch

Old Wikipedia data

 * Because it would too much work for me alone;
 * Because I worked so much on the Wikipedia entries;
 * Because I believe my intense researches are still of use (especially the labourously collected external links);
 * Because I do not know enough of the forgottenrealms Wikia lore to dare or wish to intervene directly anymore,

I just paste in the permalink of what I believe to be most exhaustive Wikipedia entry on the topic:

Most complete permalink for Anauroch

(starting point: Geographical index of Toril on 18th of March 2007)

Could some kind soul take care of extracting the data somewhere it would not be deleted again because of “lack of notability”? Note that a lot of content may be duplicate and also has to be rewritten. Some link shouls also be checked (think archive.org] if nothing else), Wizards of the Coast not being that serious with permanency of data.

David Latapie (✒ | @) 13:00, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Number of Bedine tribes
"They were divided into a dozen or so minor tribes" seems doubtful, as "The Parchless Sea" describes a scene where the Bedines gather fifteen tribes to fight against the Zhentarim and discuss the need for many more tribes who just wouldn't come. Btw, considering they presented altogether 3000 warriors in the book, and the number of tribe members might have been probably 2.5-3 times that score (half women plus some kids and elderly), a vague estimation of their total population would be 7,500-9,000 (perhaps 5,000-15,000) which, if we compare to the desert semi-nomads IRL ("semi-" because the Bedine were rather territorial, well aware of intruders within their tribal borders, etc), is definitely not enough to keep control of a big territory like most of Anauroch. --82.131.43.212 23:03, December 21, 2018 (UTC)


 * That section of the article does need to be referenced. Would you happen to have a copy of Anauroch: The Empire of Shade or Anauroch (sourcebook) to verify or correct that information? Ruf (talk) 00:57, December 22, 2018 (UTC)

Merge the two "Notable Locations" sections
I noticed that there are two separate sections titled "Notable Locations." To streamline the information and make it more accessible for readers, I would like to suggest merging these two sections into one comprehensive topic. Combining the sections would provide a more cohesive presentation of the notable locations and enable readers to easily locate all relevant information in one place. Additionally, this would help eliminate any potential confusion or redundancy. Please let me know if you agree with this proposal and if I can proceed with merging the "Notable Locations" sections. If you have any concerns or alternative suggestions, I am more than happy to discuss them further.


 * Please feel free to merge those sections. Thanks for noticing the issue! ~ Lhynard (talk) 19:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)