Talk:Ankheg

Is it just me or is this very similar to the Monstrous manual (p.7) entry? I was wondering what you guy's think about the monster type section? See here it gets really long and I think it pushes down the image and the info to far. And in the end we might have creature types for all editions, so that would drag the info box content even further. What do you guy's think? I had a quick idea about a segmented box like from the info box that would look something like [1e|Insect][2e|Arachnid] ? Terrorblades 's Far Realm logs dated 12:09, January 19, 2015 (UTC)

This
User:Terrorblades/Sandbox/Ankheg Is this capable to take that place of the old page? Iv been itching for a monster page! Terrorblades 's Far Realm logs dated 07:24, January 20, 2015 (UTC)


 * Well, Blades, your page has a few grammar errors, but it is not bad and is not copied! - Darkwynters (talk) 19:37, January 20, 2015 (UTC)


 * Yay! Btw is there any thing about the grammar that I could read up on some where? It seams that I make grammar mistakes on articles and I want to improve (feels like I'm a bother when people have to correct articles after me :S!) Terrorblades 's Far Realm logs dated  21:22, January 20, 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm intruding into another conversation here, but I will gladly explain any finer grammar issues I come across if I so happen to copy-edit one of your articles in the future. ~ Lhynard (talk) 19:52, May 23, 2015 (UTC)