Again, there is a decided lack (brought by a bias?) of 4th ed. stuff beyond basic stuff. Could it be improved?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.37.87.189 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 25 September 2010 UTC
- It's simply because there are very few editors on this wiki. Feel free to add more fourth-edition content. ➳Quin 23:13, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Add to that, that the majority of the people who do edit here do so because they love(d) the FR world - which got pretty much steam-rolled by 4th ed. So personally I'm not surprised there's a lack of people adding 4th ed. content, I know I wont be doing so for my part. Zeraktalk 11:38, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
I took the liberty of updating our mission statement to reflect our actual current policies and standards, and to address concerns from the fan community. So no 4e focus (originally added by an anon) but coverage of all editions and sources, coverage of both canon and licensed (official non-canon) sources, and summaries of key policies. I also tweaked and expanded on things all around. Let me know what you think. — BadCatMan (talk) 14:24, May 28, 2013 (UTC)