Use the following template for a nicely presented post:
{{Forum post|Write your message here!|~~~~}}
Now that the wiki has in excess of 5,000 articles, personally I feel like we're in a position to focus on quality over quantity. At the moment, anyone can add information on any article, sourced or not, and if unsourced, we generally just stick a {{unreferenced}} or {{fact}} template on it. When, if ever, do you think that we will be in a position to reject any new information on the wiki unless it is sourced? This is purely for new information though; I'm not suggesting we go through 5,000 articles stripping out all unsourced statements!
I'm not sure 5,000 plus articles is a lot of quantity. There are tons of articles about the Cormyr, but Sembia is just about blank. And tons of Baldur's Gate video game stuff fills the articles too. So how would you reject an article? If the person who did the edit listed no source? It's it OK if they do the lazy edit and just slap the further reading reference at the bottom of the page? Or only keep the article if they do it the right way with the in text citations to a reference page number? (Bloodtide 02:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC))