Hi folks. Quesiton about canon. The folks over at DMSGuild sell PDFs of old D&D books but they also publish their own straight-to-PDF adventures and expansions. It seems they have a licence from WOTC. I'm wondering how we treat these canon wise as they are expanding on WOTC books but are not directly from WOTC.
Here's some examples;
The Forgotten Realms Atlas Project: Book One contains a great high quality map of Silverymoon but m not sure if I can use it on the wiki. I've included an image of the inside cover of the PDF to clarify the licence.
File:Dmsguild atlas project FORUM DISCUSSION.jpg
Sundered Realms Player's Guide This short PDF has lots of interesting information about Anchôromé but like a lot of the DMSGuild work it has a bit of a fan-made feel to it.
Any advice would be much appreciated.
- Coming in way late, but I feel like anything in the DM's Guild not published by WotC (as they have published their own material through the DM's Guild on occasion) should not be treated as canon. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 00:21, March 16, 2018 (UTC)