Use the following template for a nicely presented post:
{{Forum post|Write your message here!|~~~~}}
Quality | Price |
---|---|
Poor Fair Good Excellent |
Cheap Moderate Expensive |
- Background
- On Template talk:Building#Non-Volo Ratings?, Moviesign and I were discussing what to do about sourcebooks that provide "non-Volo" ratings for establishments.
- Example
- The Ringed Nose tavern of Keltar is listed in Empires of the Shining Sea as having "Quality/Price: Poor/Cheap." Morgan's Inn in Velen from Lands of Intrigue Book One: Tethyr has "Quality/Price: Good/Moderate."
- Discussion
- Moviesign suggested that we might be able to just use Volo's ratings if the scales were the same, but I do not think they are. On the right are listed all the terms used that I could find in the two sourcebooks from which the two examples were provided. Note that one column has three entries and the other four.
- Question #1
- Shall I add new parameters to {{Building}} for this alternate set of ratings?
- Question #2
- Should we somehow come up with a way to categorize buildings based on quality and price?
Question #2 is a bit deeper. If we categorize them by price and quality, how do we reconcile Volo-rated establishments and non-Volo-rated establishments? It would be nice to use {{Category intersection}} to find "All inns of moderate price in Cormyr" and other similar queries, but with two (or more) different rating systems this breaks down. We'd have to standardize things before this could become useful.
An additional parameter or two or three would be useful. When I made cities from the FRA, I just tried to translate these ratings into descriptions.
But I think categorising by them would be a step too far, and don't see the need. And with two or more ratings systems in use, categorising or standardising them would be impossible. Volo's is very subjective, according to Volo's tastes. :)