Forgotten Realms Wiki
Forgotten Realms Wiki
No edit summary
Tag: Source edit
(Off to a great start.)
Line 51: Line 51:
 
;Against
 
;Against
 
;Pros:
 
;Pros:
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria.
+
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
* The article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics.
+
* The article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 
;Cons:
 
;Cons:
 
;Requests
 
;Requests
Line 68: Line 68:
 
;Against
 
;Against
 
;Pros:
 
;Pros:
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria.
+
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
* The article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics.
+
* The article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 
;Cons:
 
;Cons:
 
;Requests
 
;Requests
Line 84: Line 84:
 
;Against
 
;Against
 
;Pros:
 
;Pros:
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria.
+
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
* The article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics.
+
* The article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 
;Cons:
 
;Cons:
 
;Requests
 
;Requests
Line 100: Line 100:
 
;Against
 
;Against
 
;Pros:
 
;Pros:
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria.
+
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
* The main article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics.
+
* The main article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 
;Cons:
 
;Cons:
 
;Requests
 
;Requests
Line 116: Line 116:
 
;Against
 
;Against
 
;Pros:
 
;Pros:
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria.
+
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
* The main article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics.
+
* The main article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 
;Cons:
 
;Cons:
 
;Requests
 
;Requests
Line 132: Line 132:
 
;Against
 
;Against
 
;Pros:
 
;Pros:
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria.
+
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
* The main article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics.
+
* The main article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 
;Cons:
 
;Cons:
 
;Requests
 
;Requests
Line 148: Line 148:
 
;Against
 
;Against
 
;Pros:
 
;Pros:
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria.
+
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
* The main article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics.
+
* The main article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 
;Cons:
 
;Cons:
 
;Requests
 
;Requests
Line 164: Line 164:
 
;Against
 
;Against
 
;Pros:
 
;Pros:
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria.
+
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
* The main article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics.
+
* The main article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 
;Cons:
 
;Cons:
 
;Requests
 
;Requests
Line 180: Line 180:
 
;Against
 
;Against
 
;Pros:
 
;Pros:
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria.
+
* This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. - [[User:Regis87|Regis]]
  +
** Almost! (no caption, not formatted in some sections, very many red links) ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
* The article contains all cards from each released expansion. The cards are listed in easy-to-read collapsible tables.
+
* The article contains all cards from each released expansion. The cards are listed in easy-to-read collapsible tables. - [[User:Regis87|Regis]]
  +
* The synopses are well written and give a good overview of the game. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  +
* Standard index and card lists appear complete. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  +
* Demonstrates various features of the wiki (contains good quotes and images). ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 
;Cons:
 
;Cons:
* Not every listing in the index has an article or a redirect link.
+
* Not every listing in the index has an article or a redirect link. - [[User:Regis87|Regis]]
  +
* Formatting:
  +
** The index entries for magic items should be italicized and lower case. Please see [[Forgotten Realms Wiki:Naming conventions|the wiki's conventions for this]]. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  +
** The index entries for constructs are in italics, when they shouldn't be. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  +
** The magic section is indented for items but not constructs. They should be consistent. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  +
** Some +1, +2 items, etc, are inconsistently linked. Example: Blessed shield +2 links to Blessed Shield, but Blessed shield +3 links to Blessed Shield +3. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  +
* Realms year isn't showing up in the infobox, even though it has an entry in the code. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  +
* Main comment: Complete index, but their topics aren't documented. Many characters and other topics don't have pages (some are important enough for them to be explicitly mentioned in the expansion synopses). For example, [[Christos Tellum]]. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  +
* Excessive linking to the same topic. For example, Christos is linked to twice in the same section. ~ [[User:Possessed Priest|Possessed Priest]] ([[User talk:Possessed Priest|talk]]) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 
;Requests
 
;Requests
 
;Verdict:
 
;Verdict:

Revision as of 17:37, 15 January 2021

Forums: Helping Hand > Official Nominated Featured Sources

Use the following template for a nicely presented post:

{{Forum post|Write your message here!|~~~~}}

This thread is for nominating and discussing Featured sources. Before submitting a source article for featured status, please check that it meets each and every criterion here. Interested users should leave their vote by including their signature (~~~~) in the appropriate field (For or Against) for that nominee and update the Vote field accordingly. A source article that reaches at least 3 votes in favor, including one administrator vote, will be promoted to featured source status. When approved, please add it to the Featured Sources queue template and assign the featured source the FS banner.

Please nominate a source article in the following format:

  ==''[[Source article name]]''==
  ;Source type:
  ;Nominated by:
  ;Disclaimer:
  ;Vote: 
  ;For:
  ;Against:
  ;Pros:
  *
  ;Cons:
  *
  ;Requests
  *
  ;Verdict:
Source article name
The name of the nominated source article. This should be a direct link to the article.
Source type
What type of source is this? A sourcebook, novel, video game, board game, etc.
Nominated by
The editor who originally nominated the source article for feature status.
Disclaimer
Please note if you wrote the source article yourself or otherwise had a strong hand in it.
Vote
The current score. Please add 1 if you are for it, subtract 1 if you are against it.
For
List your name here if in favor.
Against
List your name if in not in favor.
Pros
Give a dot-point list of reasons why the source article should be featured.
Cons
Give a dot-point list of reasons why the source article should not be featured.
Requests
List anything you feel should be done to the source article that would make improve and/or make it worthy of featured status.
Verdict
The final result of the vote: 'approved' to be a featured source; 'pending' or blank if it's still under discussion; or 'refused' if it's currently irredeemable without major reworking. The verdict will be decided by an administrator after thorough checking.

Blood & Magic — Approved!

Source type
Video game
Nominated by
Possessed Priest, BadCatMan
Disclaimer
BadCatMan thoroughly documented this video game. I confirmed this work and acknowledge that its index is complete and that all manual information is included.
Vote
2
For
Possessed Priest, BadCatMan
Against
Pros
  • This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  • The article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Cons
Requests
Verdict
  • Approved.

Dungeons & Dragons Starter Set

Source type
Boxed set (manual and adventure)
Nominated by
Possessed Priest
Disclaimer
I rewrote and indexed this article whilst and after DMing this adventure, and created all pages that were missing. It contains pages all NPCs, even those just mentioned or have optional encounters. In addition, this is a very important and popular module for beginners to Dungeons & Dragons.
Vote
2
For
Possessed Priest, Regis
Against
Pros
  • This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  • The article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Cons
Requests
Verdict

Menzoberranzan

Source type
Video game
Nominated by
Possessed Priest
Disclaimer
I rewrote and indexed this article, and created all pages that were missing. This source article contains information from two full playthroughs, and all lore from the manual and cluebook is also included. It contains pages all NPCs, spells, and creatures, even those just mentioned or have optional encounters. This is the first ever video game to include Drizzt Do'Urden, one of the most popular figures in the Forgotten Realms.
Vote
2
For
Possessed Priest, Regis
Against
Pros
  • This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  • The article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Cons
Requests
Verdict

Eye of the Beholder

Source type
Video game
Nominated by
Possessed Priest
Disclaimer
I rewrote and indexed this article, and created all pages that were missing. All lore from the manual and cluebook is also included. It contains pages all NPCs, spells, and creatures, even those just mentioned or have optional encounters. This is a very popular game taking place in Waterdeep, and includes the fan favorite boss, Xanathar.
Vote
2
For
Possessed Priest, Regis
Against
Pros
  • This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  • The main article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Cons
Requests
Verdict

Eye of the Beholder II: The Legend of Darkmoon

Source type
Video game
Nominated by
Possessed Priest
Disclaimer
I rewrote and indexed this article, and created all pages that were missing. All important topics are included, and each has a page. It is a very well-received sequel to a popular game. 25 year after its release, it was still called one of the best D&D games ever made.
Vote
2
For
Possessed Priest, Regis
Against
Pros
  • This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  • The main article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Cons
Requests
Verdict

Gateway to the Savage Frontier

Source type
Video game
Nominated by
Possessed Priest
Disclaimer
I rewrote and indexed this article, and created all pages that were missing. All important topics are included. This is the first game that takes place in the popular Savage Frontier, a popular region. The improved Gold Box game engine is used, which was later used to create the first ever graphical MMO.
Vote
2
For
Possessed Priest, Regis
Against
Pros
  • This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  • The main article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Cons
Requests
Verdict

Treasures of the Savage Frontier

Source type
Video game
Nominated by
Possessed Priest
Disclaimer
I rewrote and indexed this article, and created all pages that were missing. All important topics are included, and each has a page. This is a very important video game, not just for the Forgotten Realms and Dungeons & Dragons, but video games in general. It was the first role-playing game to feature romance with an AI companion.
Vote
2
For
Possessed Priest, Regis
Against
Pros
  • This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  • The main article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Cons
Requests
Verdict

The Grand Tour

Source type
Comic
Nominated by
Possessed Priest
Disclaimer
I rewrote and indexed this article, after going through the comic page-by-page. This comic served as an advertisement for the Forgotten Realms. It includes the memorable characters from the popular D&D television show, as well as Elminster. Taking his new apprentice through the Realms, the readers experience the tales of Volo, and even hear about popular figures of the Realms, such as Qilué Veladorn and Drizzt Do'Urden.
Vote
2
For
Possessed Priest, Regis
Against
Pros
  • This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  • The main article contains no red links, indicating documentation of related topics. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Cons
Requests
Verdict

Dragonfire

Source type
Card Game
Nominated by
Regis
Disclaimer
I created the page.
Vote
1
For
Regis
Against
Pros
  • This satisfies the Featured sources criteria. - Regis
    • Almost! (no caption, not formatted in some sections, very many red links) ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  • The article contains all cards from each released expansion. The cards are listed in easy-to-read collapsible tables. - Regis
  • The synopses are well written and give a good overview of the game. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Standard index and card lists appear complete. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Demonstrates various features of the wiki (contains good quotes and images). ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Cons
  • Not every listing in the index has an article or a redirect link. - Regis
  • Formatting:
    • The index entries for magic items should be italicized and lower case. Please see the wiki's conventions for this. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
    • The index entries for constructs are in italics, when they shouldn't be. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
    • The magic section is indented for items but not constructs. They should be consistent. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
    • Some +1, +2 items, etc, are inconsistently linked. Example: Blessed shield +2 links to Blessed Shield, but Blessed shield +3 links to Blessed Shield +3. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Realms year isn't showing up in the infobox, even though it has an entry in the code. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Main comment: Complete index, but their topics aren't documented. Many characters and other topics don't have pages (some are important enough for them to be explicitly mentioned in the expansion synopses). For example, Christos Tellum. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Excessive linking to the same topic. For example, Christos is linked to twice in the same section. ~ Possessed Priest (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Requests
Verdict