[]
"The Seldarine Revisited" mentions worshipers of Tarsellis Meunniduin in the Forgotten Realms, but explicitly calls this "rumors" and "unproven", presumably to give DMs all possibilites either way. Is this qualified connection enough to remove the unrelated tag? Daranios (talk) 19:21, March 28, 2018 (UTC)
I'd personally argue that it should, especially since it seems that more than one source suggests that snow elves do exist on Toril, even if they originate from Oerth. In D&D, "rumours" are basically always facts that the general population isn't overly familiar with (take Mountain Wemics of Cormyr, who are described as rumours and myths but then literally get Statistics later on the same page). MadHatter-Himself (talk) 20:15, March 28, 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, I wasn't thinking. At the same time, though, has there been any mention of snow elves in FR besides the article in Dragon #236? Because if so, then I could create a page using the info in Dragon #155 on them. But there's no mention of them on this wiki, and only rumors in the article.--SilverTiger12 (talk) 14:23, March 29, 2018 (UTC)
- I believe I remember seeing other sources talking about them, specifically in Vaasa, but I could be misremembering. I'll have a look around my collection and see if I can find it.MadHatter-Himself (talk) 17:34, March 29, 2018 (UTC)
- I'd say evidence of what's not in the Realms, or what might be in the Realms is valid for the wiki, and is a connection to the setting. So, yes, you can remove the Unrelated tag. — BadCatMan (talk) 01:01, March 30, 2018 (UTC)