I am unsure what to be done, but we should perhaps discuss if this page should be renamed to the Vilhon Wilds, which I think is the 4th edition name for the region. It's not a great name, though, because I don't believe the Vilhon Wilds includes the northern areas of the reach, such as Turmish. So possibly the Vilhon Wilds should be a section of the Vilhon Reach page. Something to think about.WendolynCK (talk) 13:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- As of the 5e map of Faerûn, the Vilhon Reach appears to be restored. I say appears because only the northern part is visible. There are very few mentions of the area in the 5e literature, but they all refer to the "Vilhon Reach". "Vilhon Wilds" is not mentioned once. I think there is good reason to suspect that the "Vilhon Wilds" development was reverted at some point during the Sundering. My vote in this case would be to let the article remain at "Vilhon Reach" until we have more information. Ir'revrykal (talk) 13:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Good points. Yeah, given the 5e sources you mention, we should keep it the Vilhon Reach in my opinion. Certainly the minimum disruption to other sources and so forth. We can have Vilhon Wilds redirect to here.WendolynCK (talk) 14:41, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Agreed. Ir'revrykal (talk) 15:35, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Good points. Yeah, given the 5e sources you mention, we should keep it the Vilhon Reach in my opinion. Certainly the minimum disruption to other sources and so forth. We can have Vilhon Wilds redirect to here.WendolynCK (talk) 14:41, 8 April 2021 (UTC)